![soundtap streaming audio recorder 2.31 registration code soundtap streaming audio recorder 2.31 registration code](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-vFVnQGTRl6A/VE4ejCUNg8I/AAAAAAAAANQ/InBSozTooOY/s1600/cAoKmtHkrhnp.jpg)
Point, I believe the paper could be improved by addressing these carefully. However, considering the reviewer's thoughtful comments on this Seems to me that the experiment with English speakers is successful at teasing these To be sensible (following in line with, e.g. In general, I found the way the paper treated iconicity and systematicity The main point of concern of Reviewer 1 relates to the treatment of iconicity and The functions of iconicity and systematicity in words. In sum, I thought it was an interesting study that makes aĬlear and important contribution to the study of iconicity, specifically towards understanding I agree with the reviewers that the study was well done, the analysis sound, and the Reviewer was highly positive about the paper and made just a few minor suggestionsįor points where further detail or literature could be added. They suggested that major revisions were needed. The report was clearly written, but also offered some critical comments focused on The first reviewer generally thought that the study was well done and that I have sent the paper to two expert reviewers, and I have also read through it carefully The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at and Īdditional Editor Comments (if provided): Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.ġ. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.
![soundtap streaming audio recorder 2.31 registration code soundtap streaming audio recorder 2.31 registration code](http://supportharmony.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/4/7/124731268/457577433.jpg)
Include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. The opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have This file shouldīe uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'. An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes.This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version.This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s).Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript: Its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable youĭeposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your You are ready to submit your revision, log on to and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by 11:59PM. Manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the We feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteriaĪs it currently stands.
![soundtap streaming audio recorder 2.31 registration code soundtap streaming audio recorder 2.31 registration code](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-rEMNwgDDeuc/VE3_lNCZkiI/AAAAAAAAAMU/_G6H1dF3HFM/s1600/L17v0Efvt3qd.jpg)
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. Is un stylo sharper than une épée? Investigating the interaction of sound symbolismĪnd grammatical gender in English and French speakers